No: “In God We Trust” on the Face of $1 Presidential Coins

The Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan today requested that the American public avoid using the newly minted coins not because of a minting error, but because the Presidential $1 Coin Act, enacted into law in 2005 requires the government to remove “In God We Trust” from the face of the coin and put it on the edge.Many Americans believed that the lack of our National Motto “In God We Trust” on the face of the $1 Presidential coin was merely a minting error. That was because earlier in the week the Mint acknowledged that it discovered an unspecified number of the newly minted coins had the National Motto missing - by mistake. What the Thomas More Law Center takes issue with is the fact that the Mint has relegated “In God We Trust” to the virtually unreadable edge of the coin.In a correctly minted coin, the motto “In God We Trust” appears to be merely scratches on the edge, that is, unless one looks for it with a magnifying glass. Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Law Center, tested the new coin and found that 9 out of 10 people could not find the National Motto, even when asked to look for it. Thompson again encouraged Americans not to use the coin. “It is astounding that Congress has effectively done what atheist litigants have been unsuccessfully trying to do for years -- erase all reference to God from our money,” said Thompson.

The Worst President in History? Absolutely, Yes

Worst President Ever?

The nominees are;

Herbert Hoover, best actor award, "The Depression"

James Carter, best actor award, "The Hostages in Captivity"

George W. Bush, Best Supporting Actor
"A Guest Worker Program, amnesty, by Any Other Name'

George Bush, best tag lines...

"Stay the Course"
"I looked into his Soul and I saw a ...."

I think anybody who doesn't think I'm smart enough to handle the job is misunderestimating. 4/3/2000
We have a big border between Texas and Mexico. o Speech about illegal immigration, March 20, 2006
I would still invade Iraq even if Iraq never existed. o "Bush: Now Iraq's a moderate fiasco," Press-Telegram, Monday, August 21, 2006

"The work nobody wants to do"
"We need a comprehensive immigration bill to allow for a guest worker program so we can have people to work at jobs Americans Won't Do"
"Stay the Course"
"We need to secure our border, lets build a wall, er uh oh well maybe, if I find money..."
"Islamo Fascists are trying to kill us" and he does a Kerry the very next day..."You know the Folks who want to kill us"
"Stay the Course"

Ann Coulter was a hit again, but what else is new.

I staunchly believe in the first amendment right to free speech. Under the first amendment, there is no escaping the matter, but someone has to be offended. There was the ‘artistic' achievement of Andres Serrano with ‘Piss Christ'. Using a grant from The National Endowment for The Arts, Serrano produced photographs, including one of a crucifix immersed in a beaker of his own urine. The perversion of free speech did not stop there.
This was followed within the past two years by an exhibit at The Brooklyn Museum of Art that had among its offerings for public viewing, a painting of the Blessed Virgin Mary that used elephant dung as one of its materials. Rudy, then mayor of New York, was so angry he threatened to cut funding for the museum. To show how little the museum managers had learned, it followed up with another exhibit that included a picture called "Yo' Mama's Last Supper" with Jesus as a black female and another protest developed. Most recently, a museum in Santa Fe, New Mexico displayed a work by a woman named Alma Lopez who identifies herself as a Chicana lesbian. It had Our Lady of Guadalupe, who is sacred to Mexicans and Mexican-Americans, dressed in a floral bikini. The litany of outrageous art continues under the guise of free speech.

So what is the problem with the first Amendment rights of the vivacious Ann Coulter? Somehow, Ann Coulter, being Ann Coulter owes some one an apology, huh? I suggest that what she said should post as an eulogy. Coulter true to her personality said and/or implied that Senator John Edwards is somehow loosely tied to the state of faggot. You know, come to think of it, I don't feel sorry for that maggot.

There are other emerging fissures, as we progress to the elections of 2008. The movie star John Edwards was cruising along, detailing his litany of liberalism, Edwards remarked, Perhaps the greatest short-term threat to world peace, Edwards remarked, was the possibility that Israel would bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. I can picture the chill descending in the room. Edwards event was brought to a polite close.

Really? Israel is the biggest threat? Not Ahmedinijad? Not al-Qaeda? Not a coup attempt in Pakistan? Not a complete breakdown in Iraq drawing in the Saudis, Turks, and Iranians? Not liberalism, people like Edwards in our congress? Not the permanent fixtures that grace the Halls in Washington D.C.?

Israel, give me a break.

John Edwards, should not be bothered by the word faggot. Instead the senator needs make sure the people around him don't throw him into a fire. He must never wind up in jail and have to live up to the term faggot. He has to thank God and give a little extra into the collection plate on Sunday so his problems don't get as bad as those around him.

I will never vote for John Edwards. To be called a faggot is nothing compared to looking like one. As you can see Rudy Julie Anna does have problems.